Skip to main content
New

1,300+ funded startups directory

Browse
LeadMagic logo
LeadMagic
Back to comparisons
Contact Data

Apollo vs Lusha: B2B Contact Data Platform Comparison

Compare Apollo.io and Lusha on pricing, data accuracy, mobile numbers, and features. Find out which B2B contact data platform delivers better ROI.

No credit card required

Apollo.io

Apollo.io

From $49/user/month

  • All-in-one platform: CRM, sequences, dialer, and 275M+ contacts
  • Free tier with 900 credits/year — enough for a meaningful trial
  • Built-in email sequences with A/B testing and mailbox rotation
  • Intent data with up to 12 buying signal topics
  • Waterfall enrichment across multiple data providers
  • Self-serve signup with 14-day free trial on paid plans
  • AI-powered lead scoring, research, and writing assistance
  • Email accuracy around 84% — not real-time verified
  • Phone numbers cost 8 credits each, reducing effective capacity
  • Per-user pricing adds up quickly for larger teams
  • Advanced features gated behind $79–$119/user/month tiers
  • Organization plan requires minimum 3 seats
Lusha

Lusha

From $37.45/month (Starter)

  • Strong phone number accuracy — purpose-built for direct-dial outreach
  • Free tier with 40 credits/month for evaluation
  • Automated email sequences and conversation intelligence included
  • LinkedIn, CRM, and website Chrome extensions
  • AI assistant and lookalike recommendations on Starter+
  • Buying intent data with up to 25 topics on Scale plan
  • SOC2, ISO 27701, GDPR, and CCPA compliant
  • Phone number lookups consume 5 credits each vs 1 for email
  • Accuracy claims (95% email / 90% phone) not independently verified
  • Premium plan jumps to $299.95/month — steep mid-tier gap
  • Scale plan pricing requires sales call — no self-serve option
  • API rate limits on Free and Starter plans
  • Conversation intelligence costs 8 credits per recorded call

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

How Apollo.io and Lusha stack up across the features that matter most.

Feature
Apollo.ioApollo.io
LushaLusha
Email Accuracy
~84%
~95% (claimed)
Phone Number Accuracy
Varies
~90% (claimed)
Contact Database
275M+ contacts
100M+ business profiles
Built-in CRM
Email Sequences
Chrome Extension
Phone Credits
8 credits per phone number
5 credits per phone number
Free Tier
900 credits/year
40 credits/month
Intent Data
Basic signals
Scale plan only
API Access
On paid plans
Pro plan and above
Bulk Enrichment
Salesforce Integration
CRM Enrichment
Via integrations
Native CRM enrichment
Self-Serve Signup
Pro/Premium only

Pricing Comparison

See how pricing stacks up between Apollo.io and Lusha.

Apollo.io
Apollo.io

From $49/user/month

  • ~84%
  • 30K–72K credits/user/year, granted upfront
  • Monthly or annual billing
  • Mobile numbers on paid plans (8 credits each)
  • Per-user pricing
Lusha
Lusha

From $37.45/month (Starter)

  • 95% claimed deliverability
  • Annual credits granted upfront; monthly credits roll over (2x cap)
  • Monthly or annual, Scale plan requires sales call
  • Core feature — phone data emphasis (5 credits per number)
  • 1–5+ seats depending on plan

Apollo.io and Lusha are both popular B2B contact data platforms, but they're built for different buying motions. Apollo is the Swiss Army knife — a full sales platform that bundles a 275M+ contact database with a CRM, multi-step email sequences, a dialer, and intent signals, all starting at $49/user/month. Its generous free tier (10,000 credits/month) makes it the default first tool for many startups and solo SDRs entering the outbound space.

Lusha takes a more focused approach, positioning itself as the go-to platform for accurate phone numbers and contact data. With claimed accuracy of 95% on emails and 90% on phone numbers, Lusha emphasizes data quality over platform breadth. Its Chrome extension is particularly popular among LinkedIn-heavy prospectors who need to quickly pull contact details while browsing profiles. However, Lusha's credit system — where phone numbers cost 5 credits versus 1 for emails — means your actual data capacity is often much lower than the plan's headline credit count.

The comparison between these two tools often comes down to a fundamental question: do you want a platform that does everything adequately, or a tool that does data exceptionally well? But there's a third option that outperforms both on the metric that matters most — deliverability.

Feature Comparison

Apollo's all-in-one approach gives it an undeniable feature advantage. Having a CRM, email sequencing with A/B testing, a dialer, and a 275M+ contact database in a single subscription eliminates the need for 3-4 separate tools. For early-stage startups minimizing SaaS spend, this consolidation is genuinely valuable. The free tier is also a major differentiator — 10,000 credits/month with basic sequencing and CRM access lets solo founders start prospecting immediately at zero cost.

Lusha's advantage is more nuanced. Its data, particularly phone numbers, is often cited as higher quality than Apollo's. The Chrome extension provides a smooth workflow for LinkedIn-based prospecting — see a profile, click Lusha, get the contact details. Native CRM enrichment features let you automatically enrich existing records in Salesforce or HubSpot, keeping your database fresh without manual effort. For teams where phone outreach is the primary channel, Lusha's emphasis on direct-dial accuracy is a real differentiator.

The phone credit model is where Lusha's economics get complicated. Each phone number costs 5 credits — an email costs 1. On a Pro plan with 480 credits/month, you can look up 480 emails or just 96 phone numbers. If you need both email and phone for each contact, one full lookup costs 6 credits, giving you roughly 80 complete contacts per month for $37.45. That's $0.47 per fully enriched contact — significantly more expensive than it first appears.

Pricing

Apollo.io offers four tiers: Free (10,000 credits/month), Basic at $49/user/month (unlimited email credits), Professional at $79/user/month (advanced features, dialer), and Organization at $119/user/month (AI features, advanced reporting). Credits for mobile numbers and exports are separate from email credits and vary by plan. Annual billing offers a meaningful discount.

Lusha's pricing starts with a Free tier (5 credits/month — effectively a trial), Pro at $37.45/month (480 credits), Premium at $59.95/month (960 credits), and Scale (enterprise, custom pricing requiring a sales call). Phone lookups consume 5 credits each, so plan capacity for phone data is 1/5th the headline number. Annual billing provides a ~25% discount.

For a team of 5 focused on email outreach, Apollo costs $245-$595/month depending on tier. The same team on Lusha Premium costs ~$300/month but gets fewer total lookups — especially if phone numbers are needed. Apollo is the better value for teams that use its bundled features. Lusha is the better value only if phone data accuracy is the top priority and you don't need a CRM or sequencing tool.

Which Tool Is Right for You?

Different tools serve different needs. Here's an honest breakdown.

Apollo.io is best for
  • Sales teams wanting CRM, outreach, and data in one platform
  • Startups and SMBs that need an affordable all-in-one solution
  • Solo SDRs building their first prospecting workflow
Lusha is best for
  • Teams where direct-dial phone numbers are the primary need
  • Sales reps who prospect primarily via LinkedIn and need a Chrome extension
  • Mid-market companies looking for a balance of phone and email data
The Verdict
Apollo.io and Lusha target overlapping but distinct needs. Apollo is the all-in-one platform play — CRM, sequences, dialer, and data bundled at an accessible price. Lusha is the data-first play — emphasizing phone number accuracy and CRM enrichment for teams where direct-dial outreach drives revenue. Both have merit, but both share accuracy limitations that compound at scale. LeadMagic offers a third path: 97% email accuracy through real-time SMTP verification, mobile numbers included in every lookup, pay-per-result plans from $59.99/mo (2,500 credits), and credit rollover on Essential+ plans. For teams that already have their CRM and outreach tools dialed in, LeadMagic provides the accurate data layer that neither Apollo nor Lusha can match.
The Third Option

Why Teams Choose LeadMagic Instead

If you're comparing Apollo.io and Lusha, there's a third option worth considering. LeadMagic offers 99.5% email accuracy, credit rollover on Essential+ plans, and pay-per-result pricing with no contracts.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Apollo.io vs Lusha.

Ready to see the difference?

Get your API key and compare Apollo.io vs Lusha with verified data quality, transparent pricing, and workflow-ready enrichment.